PDA

View Full Version : Purple Drain


joyinrepatition
9th May 2009, 10:03 PM
Purple Drain: Is It Time To Give Up On The Prince We All Want?

Posted Thu May 7, 2009 11:10am PDT by Paul Yamada in Rock's Backpages
Paul Yamada on two more pointless chapters in the slow-death decline of a once-mighty talent.--Barney Hoskyns, Editorial Director, Rock's Backpages
http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc1/Joyinrepatition/rocksbackpages-865135647-1241716259.jpg


On the final Sunday of March, Prince released a three-CD set. Two of the albums are his music with his band; the other is by a young female singer, Bria Valente. He appeared on Jay Leno's Tonight Show the preceding Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday to promote the package, which at present is only available at Target.

The CD entitled lotusflow3r is a pastiche of slightly hard rock, proggy, Hendrix-influenced guitar playing, familiar pop-rock, and powerpop. It certainly does not herald any new or different aspirations, and though it has an up-to-date production and "finish" to the sound and production quality, this recording may very well remind his longtime fans of Purple Rain. Or at least Purple Rain without anything as exciting as "When Doves Cry," or the more surging, ecstatic moments of "Let's Go Crazy."

While the contents are polished and well-played, and for the most part easy to listen to, this music makes me wonder if there is a marketing and audience grab involved, and if so, how many fans or former fans will bite? I also wonder if other listeners will respond like I did, and think that Prince didn't have to work very hard to make this record.

Purple Rain was a hit a long time ago--25 years?--and the crossover audience and crowds he drew began to thin out by the time he released "Alphabet Street," or at least that is how I've perceived the trajectory of his career over the past 20-plus years.

The other CD, mplsound, is more disappointing. It does not impress either as (funky) dance music or as pleasant R&B. It is actually kind of boring, which seems quite a damning thing to ascribe to music by Prince. BORING.

Is there still an audience for Prince the rocker, the guitar hero who seems bound to remind us that he can ape Jimi Hendrix? What happened to the Prince who made riveting soul, funk, and jazz-tinged R&B records? What happened to the funky, slinky, jazzy Prince on guitar? He showed some of that stripped-down flash at the end of his third night on Leno: crisp, clean, funky, chicken-fried licks, delivered with an old-fashioned, lean-and-mean tone, a tone you might hear a "jazz guitarist" using in an organ (B3) and sax trio or quartet. Now, this is the Prince I'm always excited about: a guitarist who can not only evoke the best aspects of funk and soul from 1966 to 1976, but who could also be the axeman in that B3 group, and burn it down like maybe no one else could but Melvin Sparks, or Rodney Jones, having a particularly fine night. There are moments of this evocative guitar playing IN THE BACKGROUND of tracks on mplsound, but nothing more.

Most of the lead guitar Prince plays on both discs is the "over-the-top-Hendrix"-sounding stuff, with lots of boost and sustain, and very little old-fashioned dirt, like it all comes from a pedal or a computer setting. Where has the invention and the lean, probing, rhythmic drive gone?

Now that I've mentioned rhythmic drive, where has that gone? To assembly line "church," since the drums and bass playing on these discs often resembles what gets churned out on commercial, run-of-the-mill, jubilee gospel recordings: little or no variation, no substitutions, no drive, and certainly no playing that can push a guitarist, much less interact with the playing. In sustaining some energy level, the rhythm tracks relate to the hum-drum, same-ole same-ole you can hear jumping from Christian channel to Christian channel on Saturday night or early Sunday morning: NOW AIN'T THAT GOOD NEWS?!

No, because there's more going on between the bass pedals of the organ player and drummer on a Davis Sisters 45 on Savoy than there is on both of these Prince CDs, as far as bass and drums goes. If this is "give up the funk," I'd rather listen to Denise LaSalle file her nails, because that would be some scratchy rhythm!

Now that's enough with the complaints because they beg the question; as long as Prince isn't going to push the soul-funk envelope, embracing the tradition--now that he is 50--is not such a bad idea. Can you imagine what it would be like if he strapped on that sky-blue Stratocaster--or better still, a Gibson Super 400--and opened with 10 minutes of Johnnie Taylor's "Little Bluebird"? And then continued in that fashion with a workout of Taylor's "Jody," in different tempo? Yeah, and he's got a four-piece horn section along with B3, bass, and drums. After "Jody" he's really hot and slams into "Sexy MF." Then a souped-up version of "Chelsea Rodgers," a stunning version of "She Loves Me 4 Me," which showcases his "soul guitar" playing, and he wraps it up with a pumping, over-the-top rendition of "1+1+1 is 3."

Yeah, it wouldn't be an hour-long set, but it would be a great one. At present, I don't think anything like this will ever happen, as Prince has kind of become enigmatic and perhaps unconscious. He needs to realize that his old music is still great, especially the increasingly funky and soulful material he has laid down beginning with Sign O' The Times through the recent Planet Earth--though some of what he's done since Rave Un2 The Dawn is cliché and ballast--embrace it, and embrace not just the tradition he clearly understands and cares about, but use it to push the envelope in new and different ways, establishing him as a funk and soul man that could blow away most of the retro "revues" that are out there playing for kids who think you can get good chicken-fried steak at Boston Market, or worse, who think that the expression "bone fish" is really a Fishbone EP they've never heard.

It really isn't worth continuing to dream, or pick at these two Prince CDs. He's not going to do that amazing "Jody" workout. He's not going to give up doing lazy, goopy-sounding, '"quiet storm-like" tunes that even Donny Hathaway couldn't have re-arranged into anything worth listening to. If you have most, or all of Prince's recordings, like I do, go ahead and buy it. I think you will agree that Planet Earth is much, MUCH better, and much less confused, less familiar and trite, by the man's own "standards," so to speak. I'd say the same for a chunk of Rainbow Children. So buy it, if you will; and if you do like it, please go on to discover some of his better music from this decade.

Read dozens more Prince interviews and reviews at www.rocksbackpages.com. Over 14,000 articles by the greatest writers from the finest rock publications of the last 40 years.
http://new.music.yahoo.com/blogs/rocksbackpages/9319/purple-drain-is-it-time-to-give-up-on-the-prince-we-all-want/

HotAirBalloon
10th May 2009, 04:16 AM
yeah, I read this stupid article on yahoo. Some nerd living his mothers basement must of wrote this.

Funk
10th May 2009, 02:04 PM
I have to admit to agreeing with some of what has been written there.
With the exception of the masterpiece that is TRC, there has not been too much groundbreaking music from Prince, and he has kinda cruised along. The new albums are ok, but thats about it IMO, Planet Earth was average at best, 3121 was awful and Musicology was dire.

Thank god for boots.

HotAirBalloon
10th May 2009, 02:19 PM
Big suprise there when Funk agrees with the writter. lol

PS. 3121 and Musicology FTW!!!

Funk
10th May 2009, 02:40 PM
No surprise that you know everything, I mean, your a yank, therefore your opinion must be right.:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

HotAirBalloon
10th May 2009, 05:56 PM
Yeah, I know right? Damn. :)

LMAO

Shy1105
10th May 2009, 06:39 PM
Wow you guys are joking with each other...

Funk
10th May 2009, 07:34 PM
Wow you guys are joking with each other...

No we are not...:rolleyes:

Shy1105
10th May 2009, 07:52 PM
So you claim..my first clue the LMAO..

swanny
10th May 2009, 08:54 PM
Some very valid points in that article. Prince is dead artisically. Not that I blame him, he is 50 now. What other artists continued breaking new ground 30 years into their careers.

HotAirBalloon
11th May 2009, 12:53 AM
Some very valid points in that article. Prince is dead artisically. Not that I blame him, he is 50 now. What other artists continued breaking new ground 30 years into their careers.

You are soooooooooooooooo wrong. There are artists a even older than Prince doing their comeback albums right now and they're not even trying to make it like their old music and it's still fantastic. Prince is in that catagory, but he always was. He does something new all the time. Risky and successful.

Prince is nowhere near a has-been and even if he was, at least he's better than most has-been's (Michael Jackson, Madonna, Bobby Brown).

Prince is still doing his thing.

joyinrepatition
11th May 2009, 01:45 AM
Bobby Brown was never a was been!... ehh!... you know what i mean.

mpharris
11th May 2009, 07:54 AM
There are artists a even older than Prince doing their comeback albums right now and they're not even trying to make it like their old music and it's still fantastic.

Just curious, who do you mean?

Ms.Goodnight
11th May 2009, 05:03 PM
Can't stress this enough: Prince has not lost his edge nor will he ever loose it...eye wish the negativity would cease and we appreciate Prince 4 what he is: a true artist and master of his craft.

swanny
12th May 2009, 09:23 PM
Can't stress this enough: Prince has not lost his edge nor will he ever loose it...eye wish the negativity would cease and we appreciate Prince 4 what he is: a true artist and master of his craft.


what is it with you and fullofhotairballoon and this negativity malarky? We are not here to blindly worship the man. We are here to discuss and debate him and his body of work. Sometimes good sometimes bad.

As long as its honest debate surely that is all that matters?

HotAirBalloon
12th May 2009, 09:33 PM
what is it with you and fullofhotairballoon and this negativity malarky? We are not here to blindly worship the man. We are here to discuss and debate him and his body of work. Sometimes good sometimes bad.

As long as its honest debate surely that is all that matters?

So we are blindly worshiping him? Yeah, okay.....

Then again, on the other hand, you hardly have anything nice to say and come out of nowhere with negitivity, and it's ALWAYS you.

Like, on the T-Shirt's thread, you are like, "Good, something to wash my car with." And I get reported for saying something?

unique
12th May 2009, 09:46 PM
guys, it's clear that swannyy and hotairballooon won't see eye to eye on anything, so do us all a favour and ignore each other as your arguments are boring as well as childish, and i know you are both above this stupid and pointless bickering. the one thing that spoiled other fan sites is stupid arguing amongst fans, so let's not spoil this one. you can have your say so regardless of what you think, but there is no need to abuse other members of the site in having you say. that's a fairly standard rule on other sites

swanny
12th May 2009, 10:15 PM
^ point taken.

HotAirBalloon
12th May 2009, 10:45 PM
I have no regrets of anything I said or will say. But okay, I guess we'll get back on topic.

The author of this article is a complete moron and is obviously stuck in the freaking 80's. He has no evidence to back up his points and doesn't use positive points whatsoever.

PEACE & GOD BLESS :peace:

sfool